Poetry Friday: 1931

At last we move forward—Years of Grace takes us to 1931, and for the first time in many months, I glance at poetry from a specific year, as part of my curiosity about the parallels (or lack thereof) in art from a given point in time.  We are in luck with 1931: among the worthy publications of note is a collection of sonnets written by one of my favorite poets, Edna St. Vincent Millay.  The collection, entitled Fatal Interview, chronicles the rise and fall of a love affair, expressing Millay’s greatest hopes, worst fears, and most lingering of regrets.  One of the sonnets in particular, Sonnet XXX, is moderately well-known: I taught it on more than one occasion, and have heard a recording of Millay declaiming it in a very stirring voice.  Below, find the sonnet, and beyond it my reflections:

Love is not all; it is not meat nor drink
Nor slumber nor a roof against the rain,
Nor yet a floating spar to men that sink
And rise and sink and rise and sink again;
Love can not fill the thickened lung with breath,
Nor clean the blood, nor set the fractured bone;
Yet many a man is making friends with death
Even as I speak, for lack of love alone.
It well may be that in a difficult hour,
Pinned down by pain and moaning for release,
Or nagged by want past resolution’s power,
I might be driven to sell your love for peace,
Or trade the memory of this night for food.
It well may be. I do not think I would.

I think this sonnet holds in tension two ideas that are hardly original to Millay here—the first, that love is a trivial emotion that is hardly worth all the attention and praise lavished on it, and the second, that love is somehow more enduring (after all) than anything else on Earth.  I’m sure of the first (the sonnet is, after all, pretty direct about it), but the second’s a matter for dispute, I think.  I’ll try to say why I see it in the poem later on.

What “sells” this sonnet for me, and has me convinced it’s one of the better sonnets ever written by an American (the Italians and the English invented the form, and are generally best at it, I think), is Millay’s skill with words.  Look at the power of the first four lines: Millay goes right after love, and the punch of the lines is in their simplicity—36 words, of which 32 are one syllable.  The strength of a line like “Love is not all: it is not meat nor drink”, is in how swiftly it gets past your defenses with good sturdy Anglo-Saxon words that don’t have the beauty of some longer Latin-based compounds, but make up for it in being direct.  Even more powerful, I think, is the rhythmic bobbing of “sink and rise and sink and rise and sink again”, where you feel the drowning man’s struggle as the voice rises and falls with the words (it is no accident, I think, that “rise” sounds uplifting, and “sink” plummets in tone).  I’m overanalyzing this, but it’s because I really love how Millay constructs the poem out of the simplest possible language.

This is not always her approach: I’ve read plenty of what are, frankly, mediocre sonnets by Millay in which she loads down the poem with classical allusions and darling little flowery phrases.  This kind of simplicity is what she does when she’s at her best, and comes (I suspect) from really serious feeling.  At the end of this sonnet, she looks her lover squarely in the eye and says that she might easily trade all memory of their love, if she could, for something real and reliable like food or safety.  And certainly the sonnet leading up to that moment makes that sentiment plausible.  But it deflates suddenly with the understated line “I do not think I would.”  The tide of emotion she’s restraining there feels enormous to me.  Maybe I read too much into the poem, but I think Millay is screaming inside by that point—she wants to tell him that despite the utter helplessness she feels in trying to love him, despite her knowledge that it can all evaporate tomorrow and that she can be left behind, completely forgotten, there is nothing in the world that could tear her away from him.  I recognize the poem can be read differently—that Millay is genuinely uncertain.  That she loves him but she does not know if it is a love that could withstand the kind of stress that really exists in the world.  I don’t think so: I think the fact that she expresses the sentiment so late in the poem, and with such reserve, is her way of undercutting the sonnet—executing “the turn” that poets put at the end of many sonnets, like Shakespeare admitting that despite his mistress’s eyes being nothing like the sun, he finds her more rare and lovely than anyone he’s ever known.  But what do you think—am I reading this right?

7 comments on “Poetry Friday: 1931

  1. aprillmartin says:

    James, thank you for writing so thoughtfully about this poem. I cannot say that I have many favorite poets but Millay is my absolute. And I have to admit that she is one of the few writers for whom I voraciously collect works. I have and love a first edition Fatal Interiview and also have Edna St. Vincent Millay Reading Her Poetry on vinyl which includes this poem. How do you italicize in this reply box?!?

    Anyway, thanks again. I had no idea that I would be prompted to think of this lady today and am really happy that it has happened.


    P.S. I totally agree with your reading of “Love is not all.” And, “darling little flowery phrases” is a darling little flowery phrase in itself.

    • jwrosenzweig says:

      April—you’re welcome! I’m so pleased to have given you a moment with your favorite poet: your Millay collection sounds wonderful. 🙂 Enjoy your Labor Day weekend!

  2. Graham says:

    I think you’re reading it right. While the sentiment remains heresy to many academics, I still have a hard time thinking of much rhymed, metered work as anything but an intellectual exercise/practice for maintaining nuance and song in work that doesn’t sound like a nursery rhyme, but this piece totally hit me. and i think it was because of those anglo-saxon words and the back and forth of emotion.

  3. […] comes from skill with sound and meter—the rhythm of “sink and rise” in “Love is not all” or the cheerful, almost sing-song sound patterns of her poem about running back and forth […]

  4. […] Millay is also usually at her best when considering the two great obsessions of her life—love and death—and a blunt look at war seems to me to suit them nicely.  Millay’s pacifism […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s